The need for African counter-intelligence

 

“There are two things in intelligence. There is the absence of intelligence—well, that’s a mistake in the profession—and the exploitation of intelligence.”

          – Jean-Pierre Augé for RFI, 5th July 2024

by Soany Pougala

 

In March 2024, retired French colonel Jean-Pierre Augé published a memoir on his 20-year long career in Africa as a member of the French intelligence services agency, the DGSE, the Directorate General for Exterior Security. 

The book’s title “Afrique Adieu”, meaning “Farewell Africa”, references Augé’s perception of an ever more distant growing Africa, in light of the then recent coup d’états in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso which had overthrown French-backed governments. 

One bizarre yet almost comical aspect of the book is that despite official narratives from the French government that treats all accusations of exploitation, corruption and neocolonialism as fictitious illusions imagined by a bitter African youth, Augé lays in plain sight just how deeply involved the French government has been in African politics for the past decades.

Whether in Togo, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, or Niger, Augé takes the reader along the numerous missions which had been assigned to him on African soil. 

At times, his work ‘simply’ involved contacting African journalists, intellectuals and activists, convincing them to work as informants for the DGSE. 

At other times, he would write reports of his field observations, giving insights on the current political, social and sometimes military situation to provide his government with a better understanding of the potential opportunities that could be seized to further France’s interests. 

Perhaps more interestingly, is his self-admitted close relationship with many African heads of state, who themselves were well aware of his role as a French secret service agent. Behaving as their close aid, security and advisor, he would directly report their every move and word to what he refers to as “Paris”, a euphemistic metonymy which almost distracts the reader from realizing that African governments are under constant surveillance by the French state. 

However, the relationship is displayed as somewhat consensual. The DGSE officers do not force themselves in, but are in fact invited into the lives of the heads of state, ministers, friends and family members of the ruling authorities. In his own words, when describing how he met then Chadian president Idriss Déby: 

“It was at the end of a day in July 1994 that Idriss Déby received me. Before his eyes was the letter of introduction from Commander Augé, signed by the DGSE. My host asked me about the details of my installation, listened to my first impressions, and asked me if I had any needs that the presidency could meet.” (p.191)

From the nonchalant way of writing, one would almost believe that this was the meeting of two old friends reuniting after a long time apart, or of a relative moving to live with a member of his extended family. 

The tragedy is so grotesque that it becomes almost comical: a close and intimate relationship between a country’s leadership and the secret services officer of a foreign nation. Anywhere else in the world, we would call this high treason – but in Africa, it is just another summer day.

As years went by, Augé became the Chadian president’s closest advisor. The intimacy of this relationship is justified during the 1996 presidential elections. Up until now, Chad had never held democratic elections. In order to appeal to the international community (and international institutions’ potential aid), it was deemed important to give the illusion that the French-supported president had any legitimacy to rule.

Before the public release of election results, Jean-Pierre Augé received a confidential call from one of his colleagues informing him that Idriss Déby won the first round with over 60% of votes. Of course, France wanted Déby to win. But overshooting the election results to such a degree was sure to attract suspicion.

Worried that the credibility of their puppet leader would suffer in result, the French state sent instructions to Jean-Pierre Augé: make sure that the Chadian president agrees to a second round of elections so that his victory appears more “democratic”. Despite initial resistance, Idriss Déby eventually gives. He organises a second round which he unsurprisingly wins. Having successfully changed the president’s mind, Augé gloats:

“In Chad today, France-Africa is alive and well, and my position as ‘special’ advisor is fully justified!” (p.224)

Idriss Déby would go on to govern until his assassination in 2021, two months after celebrating 30 years in power. He was then immediately succeeded by his son, Mahamet Déby, who shared in his memoir that he was sent to study in a French military preparatory school in Aix-en-Provence right after finishing high school.  The BBC reports:

“In his book, he recalls his stay in his father’s village, when a French army helicopter landed in search of him. A few hours later, he found himself standing in front of his father, who informed him of his new departure for France.”

 

The French state, through its army and intelligence agency, has groomed and raised not only this generation of leaders, but also the next ones to come.

That is the perversion of the matter.  It would be foolish to believe that this situation has only been caused by the isolated acts of a corrupt few, and that removing a country’s figurehead would suffice in dismantling the foreign intelligence networks which have penetrated the African political sphere. In a publicly shared book, Augé admits that the DGSE has relations with politicians, journalists, activists, professors, and the families of their most important targets. Such relations are hereditary. They renew themselves so that even as individuals change, get promoted, move or die, the power structure maintaining African countries’ subjugation remains.

When Jean-Pierre Augé walked into Idriss Déby’s office to introduce himself to him and begin his new work, he did not need to re-introduce his employer nor his purpose. The relationship has been established beyond its enacting individuals, who only aim to reproduce it.

It is abundantly clear that Africa suffers a crisis of national security. To say that we have damaged information channels or that we have suffered from information leaks is a distortion of reality. Our administrations and governments are completely transparent. France knows what our treasury looks like, what our industry’s weaknesses are,  which political agents are disruptive and which are malleable, what is the personality of those in power, as well as the personality of their spouses and children, what they eat for breakfast and what they disdain at dinner.

Yet, we know nothing about France, or any other Western country for that matter. While we are transparent, other countries remain opaque. No one can win a card game with a revealed hand, not when other players’ cards remain hidden.

This asymmetry of information means the death of African strategy, diplomacy, and any form of relevancy in the international system.

What is the point of giving great speeches to the people claiming that the death of imperialism is near, showing bravado when discussing Western countries while simultaneously letting them in close enough to hear the heartbeat of our nations? 

We must track down all the ways in which our political intelligence has been compromised, and prevent foreign agents from exploiting such viable and intimate information at our expense and to their own benefit. 

It seems inevitable that to survive this war of information in which we find ourselves on the losing end, we will need to develop our own counter-intelligence strategy, aiming to cease the information hemorrhage which we have politically evolved into.

Soany Pougala

September 25, 2025

 

 

Sources:

1. Jean-Pierre Augé. (2024). Afrique Adieu Mareuil Editions.

2. Jean-Pierre Augé. (2024, July 5). Il est très difficile de déterminer le jour d’un putsch [Interview]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xcRFekxKBY

3. BBC Afrique, (2024, April 28) “Mahamat Déby: portrait d’un général qui veut diriger le Tchad”, https://www.bbc.com/afrique/articles/czd83vvpqgqo

Comments

21 responses to “The need for African counter-intelligence”

  1. Chinda

    Super pour la qualité de l’analyse. S’il est vrai et établi que la classe dirigeante actuelle des Etats africains a échoué dans la protection de l’information et du renseignement, que peut bien faire le petit citoyen ordinaire dans la protection de cette information ?

    1. Madjadoum NON-DIL

      Très belle question mais je crois qu’elle ne doit pas être adressée seulement à Mme/Mlle Soany P.
      Nous sommes devant une évidence contre laquelle deux choses, à la rigueur trois s’imposent.
      – Primo : Il faut déjà de rompre cet accord qui oblige la transmission hebdomadaire ou quotidien de nos renseignements de tout genre aux Etats occidentaux (anciennes puissances coloniales, à l’instar de la France dans les pays francophones) et par la même occasion les écarter du cercle restreint des informations et ensuite les sevrer définitivement pour passer opacité dont ils en font une religion, au même titre qu’eux. Mais ne nous méprenons pas, cela aura des conséquences et un fort prix à payer ;
      -Secundo : il faut que les dirigeants réapprennent le patriotisme pur et dur à l’africaine et en fasse une vertu cardinale et qu’ils deviennent sincèrement jaloux de leur indépendance, à tous les niveaux, et transmettent et/ou obligent toute la classe politique (et par extension toutes la nations africaines) à la diffusion et à la transmission de cette fibre à la génération présente et future.
      A y voir de près, il semble avoir, à la fois, chez ceux qui trahissent –volontairement ou non-, une certaine attitude revancharde imposée par une volonté dissimulée de lutter contre la mauvaise gouvernance locale faute d’être entendus et compris de la classe dirigeante et de l’autre la construction graduelle d’une assurance d’accès à une porte de sortie en cas de survenance du pire. Ce qui peut être évité ou balayé par une reconstruction sincère de la gouvernance locale sur des idéaux sains et mus par les seuls intérêts de nos nations envers et contre tout et tous.
      – Tertio : il faut arriver à décomplexer les africains inconscients de cette soumission dictée par cette conception que le meilleur et la bonne façon de diriger se conçoit ou doit toujours venir d’ailleurs. Dans toutes guerre, et sans euphémisme, disons c’en est une, il faut toujours partir des stratégies qui tiennent compte des réalités (fort, faiblesses, menaces et opportunités) et de la connaissance de l’autre et de nos forces sans oublier nos faiblesses et les renforcer et surtout d’user de la meilleure des stratégies qui s’impose au regard des réalités de l’heure et d’enclencher celle qui s’imposera après cette première victoire. Car ce sera une guerre sans fin et sans merci. Elles –les ex puissances coloniales- ont bâti leur économie, leurs hégémonies et leurs statuts actuels en tirant profit de nos faiblesses donc ne se laisseront pas facilement emporté par le vent de nos réveils tardifs.
      Quand tout ce monde –africains de tout bord- aura compris son rôle et l’importance vitale de colmater les brèches actuelles et de s’atteler à les faire disparaitre demain, nous y arriverons.

      Merci !

  2. Prince Emmanuel Ngandjui de Wouendeu

    Merci beaucoup ma fille pour ta leçon et conseil. J’espère que nos dirigeants vont te lire et s’organiser dans ce precare français.

    1. Korey

      Bravo !

      1. Koré

        Cousin

    2. Linus SAHA

      Très instructif.
      Maintenant à nous d’avoir la sagesse et la patience de construire en toute discrétion notre système de contre-espionnage pour un jour renverser la vapeur.

  3. Anonymous

    Bravo et merci bien pour cet article qui présente une réalité amer du renseignement en Afrique.
    Il faut dire que ces agents de la France ont des bureaux au sein de plusieurs services, structures et organisations en Afrique. Ils savent tout de nous, nous ne connaissons rien d’eux.

  4. Je suis d’accord avec le fait que les informations privées de nos états ne sont pas protégées. Mais j’ai du mal croire c’est juste une volonté de nos dirigeants. Si ceux qui se sont rebellés ont été assassiné cela peut laisse entendre qu’une potentielle menace règne encore sur les dirigeants africains qui ne coopèrent pas. Si parmis ces dirigeants il y’en a qui ont été pistonné par la France alors c’est illusoire de croire qu’ils se retourneront contre leurs maîtres aussi facilement car ils leurs doivent un peu leurs pouvoirs. A l’entendre parler ( cet ancien agent de la DGSE) on peut avoir l’impression que la France-Afrique etait une idée africaine et que même sa survie et continuité etait juste souhaité par les africains ce qui n’est pas le cas bien evidement. Je pense qu’un dirigeant élu dans les règles de l’art ou alors ayant arraché le pouvoir n’aurait jamais dévoilé ses informations aussi facilement.

    1. Leuwe donse Frank Elie

      Merci soagny Pougala

  5. BASSANE Gnambié

    Merci

  6. YOUTOU

    Tel père, telle fille. C’est logique, comment aurait-il été autrement. Vous avez été moulée par votre géniteur. La relève est plus que assurée.

    Bravo à vous S. POUGALA.

  7. C’est très puissant

  8. Habib nato

    Merci beaucoup 🙏

  9. mo

    Certes il est fort intéressant de comprendre mais il ne sert à rien d’épier l’autre . L’Afrique a raison. C’est aux autres d’apprendre à cohabiter avec les autres. La finalité de la vie est de faire avancer l’aisance de l’être humain dans son environnement et non accumuler.

  10. mo

    *L’Afrique a raison …

  11. Anonymous

    Aujourd’hui, la seule issue pour l’Afrique c’est la Révolution contre l’impérialisme américain, Européen et ses amis africains.

Leave a Reply to Korey Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *